
I received an Advance Reader’s Copy of this book. It’s publication date is May 7, 2019. All opinions are my own.
Let’s start with the positives. This novel is set in South Africa and the Boer War plays a major role in it. A good portion of the book is set during the Boer War and specifically in the Bloemfontein Concentration Camp in 1901 where the English imprisoned many Afrikaaners (mostly women and children) during the war. I knew very little about the Boer War before beginning this book and everything I’d read previously was from the English or Canadian perspective and approached it as a blip of history, nothing too bad. In fact, this was one of the first uses of concentration camps and while they weren’t technically death camps, many died in them due to illness. Homes and livelihoods were destroyed and the repercussions are long-lasting (as the book explores).
This section of the book is told from the perspective of Sarah, a young woman who has been imprisoned with her six-year-old son Fred after her husband leaves them to fight the English. The section takes the form of letters written to her husband following his departure and initially, I hated it. I don’t generally enjoy epistolary-style novels and I especially hate them when the writer (Sarah in this case) spends time describing things the reader (her own husband of nine years) would obviously know. She doesn’t need to describe what their son looks like or how things work on their farm. He only left a week ago! She doesn’t need to tell him in great detail about the beginning of their relationship; he was there! He probably remembers!
However, as her story progresses, the style feels more honest because she is in fact telling him things he doesn’t know. Added to this the tension of being in the camp and the unknown of what will happen to her and Fred and I found myself wanting to keep reading.
Then the story quickly changes. We jump to 1976 and then follow Rayna, her daughter Irma, and Irma’s son Willem through to 2010 when Willem is sent to a boot camp outside of Johannesburg. I was disappointed to leave Sarah’s story behind and here it felt like Barr was trying to cram a lot in. We get thirty-five years of history in a couple hundred pages. And South Africa has a lot of history in those years. Honestly, if I didn’t have a basic understanding of apartheid in South Africa, I would have been lost. Willem is born in 1994, the day Nelson Mandela was elected as president and while the novel mentions the chaos of the day and the election, it tells us nothing about what that means or why. Instead, the emphasis on the Boer War and its after effects makes it seem like the conflict between English and Afrikaans is the only ill will in the country.
For me, Part Two just didn’t have the pull of Part One. In trying to involve more characters, none of them ever quite become fully fleshed. Irma in particular feels most like a stereotype and Willem, who we follow the closest, never feels complete. There are hints at who he is but it’s like the novel doesn’t want to fully reveal him to us.
I also had a problem with the conclusion. There is (obviously) a connection between the characters in part one and part two that isn’t quite a twist. (Not sure if it’s trying to be.) In the end, it seems like the novel wants part one to offer an excuse for the violence of part two. I wish instead that we could have seen the conclusion of Sarah’s story, instead of simply being told. I would much rather have heard it in her own words. Even if she was telling it to her husband.
A shame the execution seems to have let down what could have been a very powerful read.
A pity – the idea of a book set in the Boer War appeals, but I’m fed up with the past/present theme of so many books at the moment. And those letters would have driven me crazy! Maybe her husband was suffering from amnesia… š
We never meet her husband so I suppose anything’s possible! I don’t know why so many books are doing the past/present combo right now. Is there a concern that readers won’t be captivated by simply one story? I’m realizing that it’s rare both stories are equally well written.
I always find that too, and it’s usually the historical one that interests me most.
Me too! The last book I read that had this problem also had a historical section that focused on a lesser known (or publicized) portion of history. It feels like the authors are nervous about devoting a whole book to the topic and so try to balance it out with modern day stories. I wish their editors would sort them out!
Hmm that’s a shame. I’d like to learn more about this time in history and geography because I feel like it’s so important, but it sounds like this author just took on too much in this one book.
It is a bit of a lost period when it comes to literature (at least in North America) and I found it fascinating to learn more about the country and time. There’s an afterword where the author talks about his inspiration and I think he probably got excited about too many stories and tried to fit them all together.
[…] You Will Be Safe Here – Damian Barr (Anansi International, 2017) […]